Comments on: Historians argue that the Cold War began in 1918 when the World War I Allies, including the US sent forces to? http://nwwone.org/blog/historians-argue-that-the-cold-war-began-in-1918-when-the-world-war-i-allies-including-the-us-sent-forces-to World War 1 Sun, 20 May 2012 07:28:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: David C http://nwwone.org/blog/historians-argue-that-the-cold-war-began-in-1918-when-the-world-war-i-allies-including-the-us-sent-forces-to/comment-page-1#comment-573 David C Sat, 24 Jul 2010 05:13:49 +0000 http://nwwone.org/blog/historians-argue-that-the-cold-war-began-in-1918-when-the-world-war-i-allies-including-the-us-sent-forces-to#comment-573 You don't. The Cold War ended after WWII. We were "allies" with the Russians during the war but after that, we had different ideas about how the world should be. Russia chose Communism and we took capitalism. The only reason we were allies is because of this statement: "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." Russia was useful for that and that is ALL. You don’t.

The Cold War finished after WWII. We were “allies” with the Russians during the war but after that, we had different thoughts about how the world should be. Russia chose Communism and we took capitalism. The only reason we were allies is because of this statement: “The rival of my rival is my friend.” Russia was useful for that and that is ALL.

]]> By: thesurfer http://nwwone.org/blog/historians-argue-that-the-cold-war-began-in-1918-when-the-world-war-i-allies-including-the-us-sent-forces-to/comment-page-1#comment-572 thesurfer Sat, 24 Jul 2010 04:26:17 +0000 http://nwwone.org/blog/historians-argue-that-the-cold-war-began-in-1918-when-the-world-war-i-allies-including-the-us-sent-forces-to#comment-572 Historians are correct! The events leading to the 1918 allied intervention on russia are like follow: 1.) Because Turkey enter the war on Germany side they close the border with Russia, as a consequence Russia was blockaded! 2.) Britain and friends try to open Russia for material aid but they could not because of Turkish opposition ( i love Turkey!) 3.) Russia was a giant with feet of clay! they got worse supply logistics, their railroads and rail networks were not capable to transport civilian goods and military personnel, because of that the Russian economy collapsed and the army could not be supplied! 4.) Popular sentiment was on the rise against the executive power and to the war as a whole 5.) The Bolsheviks rose from popular sentiment 6.) The western allies had sent guns to Russia to keep fighting, those weapons could not fall into enemy hands! so they sent several mission to recover those weapons 7.) It is the communist logic to think you are with me or against me so they understood that to be an invasion against Communist Future, not because of the weapons, yet they did not have trouble using capitalistic weapons for communist up rising! 8.) So yes, the west had sent men and planes, they fight but could not prevail, it was Britain, France, the United States and Japan! 9) For those countries such an intervention does not deserve a foot print or foot note from their papers,lt was not important to remember, for communists that was prove of western capitalism against communism, they never forgot Check after from www.thehistorynet.com. or go to wikipedia.com Historians are right!

The actions leading to the 1918 allied intervention on russia are like follow:

1.) Because Turkey enter the war on Germany side they close the border with Russia, as a consequence Russia was blockaded!

2.) Britain and friends try to open Russia for material aid but they could not because of Turkish opposition ( i like Turkey!)

3.) Russia was a giant with feet of clay! they got worse supply logistics, their railroads and rail networks were not capable to transport civilian goods and military personnel, because of that the Russian economy collapsed and the army could not be full!

4.) Well loved sentiment was on the rise against the executive power and to the war as a whole

5.) The Bolsheviks rose from well loved sentiment

6.) The western allies had sent guns to Russia to keep fighting, those weapons could not fall into rival hands! so they sent several mission to renovate your health those weapons

7.) It is the communist logic to reckon you are with me or against me
so they understood that to be an invasion against Communist Future, not because of the weapons, yet they did not have distress using capitalistic weapons for communist up rising!

8.) So yes, the west had sent men and planes, they fight but could not prevail, it was Britain, France, the United States and Japan!

9) For those countries such an intervention does not deserve a foot print or foot note from their papers,lt was not vital to remember, for communists that was prove of western capitalism against communism, they never forgot

Check after from http://www.thehistorynet.com. or go to wikipedia.com

]]> By: Mark F http://nwwone.org/blog/historians-argue-that-the-cold-war-began-in-1918-when-the-world-war-i-allies-including-the-us-sent-forces-to/comment-page-1#comment-571 Mark F Sat, 24 Jul 2010 03:36:27 +0000 http://nwwone.org/blog/historians-argue-that-the-cold-war-began-in-1918-when-the-world-war-i-allies-including-the-us-sent-forces-to#comment-571 Oh boy, more homework questions. Oh boy, more research questions.

]]> By: u_bin_called http://nwwone.org/blog/historians-argue-that-the-cold-war-began-in-1918-when-the-world-war-i-allies-including-the-us-sent-forces-to/comment-page-1#comment-570 u_bin_called Sat, 24 Jul 2010 03:13:05 +0000 http://nwwone.org/blog/historians-argue-that-the-cold-war-began-in-1918-when-the-world-war-i-allies-including-the-us-sent-forces-to#comment-570 If you're talking about the fighting at Archangel, there was actual shooting going on between the parties, so technically that was still a "hot" war. If you’re talking about the fighting at Archangel, there was actual shooting going on between the parties, so technically that was still a “hot” war.

]]>