World War I Blog

Leave a Reply

1. jlya2012

   June 5, 2010 at 3:38 am

   The being before WWI were not peaceful.

    

2. Chiswick2

   June 5, 2010 at 3:48 am

   Germany had colonies, but their empire was tiny compared to that of Britain and France.

    

3. benympls

   June 5, 2010 at 4:25 am

   @Bunionification Yeah germany had 5-7 colonies thru out their whole description & they secured them for trade. Germany’s whole economy is/was based on trade, they didnt care to be a world empire. But yeah i was just talking in general.

    

4. benympls

   June 5, 2010 at 4:42 am

   @BengalG3 During the “dark ages” the Vikings Ran europe & were trading with the world sailing the globe. The Vikings description is distorted on purpose because it was chatholic monks that knew how to write & is the bases for most of the info at that time but the Vikings resisted christianity for nearly 800 being. Witch is why so many lies about the Vikings exist. They bathed unlike the christians, they sailed the globe but NEVER tried 2 conquer any1 & were the elite fighting break down of the world.

    

5. Bunionification

   June 5, 2010 at 5:32 am

   @benympls Germany had colonies in africa and asia, but lost them after the war

    

6. myblueandme

   June 5, 2010 at 6:11 am

   English and French call it golden age. Afterall they were killing millions in Africa and Asia and bringing thr wealth in Britan/France. Later they paid all this to Adolf Hitler.

    

7. davidallenroth

   June 5, 2010 at 6:50 am

   WHAT A SHAME

    

8. ilovemokona2

   June 5, 2010 at 7:27 am

   really only Japan, Russia, US and Germany are fighting,(Britain maybe)
   the rest are just the supporting character or conquered

    

9. benympls

   June 5, 2010 at 7:57 am

   @gipcambero Your right, germany did have 5 colonies thru out its description but they were to hold down trade lines that british controlled rather than expanding of an empire. But i did misspoke

    

10. gipcambero

    June 5, 2010 at 8:10 am

    @benympls

    Tanganyka, marshall island

     

11. stepheng1483

    June 5, 2010 at 8:50 am

    Listen to Jew Benjamin Freedman’s 1961 speech to see the real reason why the U.S.A. went to war in World War 1.

     

12. benympls

    June 5, 2010 at 9:31 am

    Germany NEVER had Colonies!!!

    Germany is the excellent guys!!!

    France & England Are The Evil Doers!!!

     

13. yohanZ95

    June 5, 2010 at 9:57 am

    @greatpunter Only the Arabian side of africa has developed, south of the sahara desert (except south africa) has never really evolved. I don’t know why. Maybe because they gave the africans guns to early.

     

14. greatpunter

    June 5, 2010 at 10:21 am

    @yohanZ95 and never will(too fucking bone idle)

     

15. Roochfan20

    June 5, 2010 at 10:33 am

    @BengalG3 the Sasanid Persians were by now on the decline by the late 500s AD with their ongoing struggles with the Byzantines and the Arabic nomads who were newly converted to Islam by Mohammed ultimately knocked them down. In other terms, it wasn’t all rosy in the rest of the world either at the downfall of the Western Roman Empire.

     

16. Roochfan20

    June 5, 2010 at 11:15 am

    @BengalG3 Not all of the non-European nations had golden ages. I believe that China, under the Tang and Sui dynasties, was the exclusion but even before then, China was in political turmoil after the downfall of the Han Period which led to the 3 Kingdoms period and then a series of dynasties that were overthrown shortly after they had the imperial throne.

     

17. yohanZ95

    June 5, 2010 at 11:26 am

    @BengalG3 That’s right, but africa haven’t really evolved anything.

     

18. celebration81

    June 5, 2010 at 12:20 pm

    Balfour declaration. It was the goal of jewish zionist. England promised palestine for jews in USA. Therefore the Jews rope USA to WW1 in the side of England.

     

19. drfreeman007

    June 5, 2010 at 12:38 pm

    sounds like anti western propaganda to me

     

20. salesman990

    June 5, 2010 at 1:00 pm

    Colonialism is the most overrated “cause” of ww1. So much evidence against it, yet usual.

     

21. jsckillab4lkilla

    June 5, 2010 at 1:48 pm

    happend in 1991

     

22. jmanz315

    June 5, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    @touchtoomuch08
    WWI was the result of many factors: nationalism (Pan Slav movement where Serbia wanted to unite all the Slavs, common goal with Russia). Germany allied with Austria-Hungary because AH had no other allies – its empire was in decline. Also it was the Balkans (not Baltics).
    Fritz Fischer argues that the main reason for WW1 was Germany and its aggression – Germany had a Weltpolitik and aggressive foreign plot which saw war as a means of achieving her expansionist aims.

     

23. XavierLax

    June 5, 2010 at 2:56 pm

    @BengalG3 What you say about Europe in family member to Asia is right to some point, Asia did develop generous scale society first and Africa last, but this is due to geography. Africa is the way it is because of geography not colonialism in and of itself, which is an effect of the worlds geography as well. Each region has its own unique advantages and disadvantages.

     

24. stepheng1483

    June 5, 2010 at 3:31 pm

    What you don’t hear about is the real reason why the U.S.A. went to war in World War 1. Listen to Jew Benjamin Freedman’s 1961 speech to hear how the Jews dragged the U.S.A. into World War 1 without a care as to how many young Americans would be killed.

     

25. touchtoomuch08

    June 5, 2010 at 3:58 pm

    So, from a realist POV, WWI was the result of Germany fearing the rising power of Russia. Austria joined Germany and France joined Russia because of interests in the Baltics. England saw a themselves declining and Germany rising, and had to nip it in the bud. Is this more or less right Political Science majors? (I have a test tomorrow and need to solidify my understanding)